« March 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 2007 Archives

May 19, 2007

Teacher As Researcher--Writing and Reflecting

We had our final official Teacher As Researcher Grant meeting on Wednesday, May 16. This year has been dedicated to reflecting on our work of the last three years and writing a collaborative paper.

We met in a special education classroom at an elementary school where the principal is involved in action research and portfolio work. I love this picture of the group because the students' "Listening Center" poster on the wall is a great caption for the work that we did.
TARgroup.jpg

At the close of the meeting I asked everybody to reflect on these two questions:
How has being in this group influenced your thinking? and Have you seen changes in your colleagues' thinking? The reflections are in the extended entry.

Continue reading "Teacher As Researcher--Writing and Reflecting" »

Hummus Recipe

We forgot to order snacks for Wednesday's Teacher As Researcher meeting, so I prepared a platter of fresh veggies that were in my fridge and some homemade hummus. A couple of people have asked for the recipe, so here it is.

The basic recipe appeared in the March 2002 issue of Parents magazine in the article "The 20 Best Snacks for Kids." I have noted any changes that I make.

HUMMUS
Yield: 2 cups

1 can (19 oz.) chickpeas, rinsed and drained [It's really difficult to find this size. I just use the 14.5 or 15 oz can]
1/4 cup fresh lemon juice
1/4 cup sesame tahini [If this is not a regular item in your pantry, check the Asian food aisle at your grocery store.]
1/4 cup water
1 Tbs. olive oil [I often reduce this or leave it out entirely to save a few calories.]
1 garlic clove, finely minced [I add more]
1/2 tsp. salt

Combine all ingredients in food processor fitted with metal chopping blade; pulse to puree.

[I add several spices for my version. A LOT of freshly ground coriander--probably a full teaspoon. Then a couple of shakes of cumin, paprika, cayenne, and black pepper.]

May 21, 2007

December TAR Meeting

On December 5, 2006, the Teacher As Researcher Bridge group met at Wilson Elementary. Here are some of the reflections from that evening. The reflection questions were “What have you learned?” and “What do you need?”

“I learned how important it is to really “savor” the small moments and slow down maybe I could go further and say digest it. If the moment is digested, the mechanisms might repeat themselves some where from the “inner well” of the teacher. Small moments are usually proceeded by something big.
I just need to hear more of what my co-horts have to share.”

“Critical thinking can be evaluated in different ways. What is role of teacher? What experiences make a good teacher? How do socio-economic issues affect student behavior and their ability to learn?
I think I need to hear teachers give testimonies of what works for them. I think less emphasis on educational theories. Collaboration is a good concept as long as everyone does work together well and respects each other.”

“This was my first session w/ the group, so I’ve learned the structure, pace, some expectations. Most importantly, it seems like a time and place to share serious thoughts about education from an educator’s perspective. I’m very excited to be part of the group and look forward to our next meeting.
What do we need? Bigger chairs J”

“Looking Forward—Learned will be doing this. Hearing writing from others on their research. Heard ideas that connect to research=> ah-ha moments when student thinks critically.
Need—nothing. What is happening with discussions very interesting.
=> Professional Development certificates that list what, date and 2.5 hours.”

“I need to slow down the moments working in a fast food/ drive through everything I have discovered besides showing, I have to show slowly. Describe, time, place and all five senses to get the feeling of the moment.
I love the location, food was good—love the readings=> love the new people.”

“Groups like my CFG, portfolio group & the TAR group help me to stay focused with my ongoing teacher research. Keeps my toes to the fire-so to speak.
I like the opportunity to share and receive feedback from other people also doing the same work or dilemmas.”

“What did I learn?
• Continue to focus on the finer point
• Illustrate thru narration
• Remembering that teachable moment or when time/teaching slowed [it’s like slipping a transmission into that certain gear that smoothes out the engine and eliminates the distracting rumble.”

“I learned that teachers have experiences to share and that they can write with relative ease about these experiences. However, when things become abstract (I don’t think they did tonight), eyes glaze over.
The new working environment worked well, although I think people are creatures of habit and desire the same surroundings.”

May 22, 2007

Finally Sharing Again

One reason that I haven’t blogged much for a few weeks is that so much of what I’ve been working on has not been public knowledge. Much of the CFG as Research Team (CART) grant preparations and scoring had to be kept under wraps. Now that the awards have been announced, I feel like I can breathe again. This goes back to a tension that I wrote about at a Teacher As Researcher meeting and in one of the traveling journals for the portfolio group: How can I make my practice public and retain a feeling of safety? What are the implications of making my own practice public when so much of what I do is collaborative?

May 29, 2007

CFG As Research Team Awards

Congratulations to the following educators who have been awarded the Houston A+ Challenge’s CFG As Research Team (CART) Grant for the following year. These grants encourage qualified CFG coaches to form a group and use action research to study their own practice.

Chong-Hao Fu and his team from KIPP Sharpstown College Prep will be asking “How can we create a school-wide vision of student and teacher excellence that looks beyond simple quantitative data and seeks a more comprehensive view of teaching and learning?”

Michaelann Kelley and an interdisciplinary team from Eisenhower High School in Aldine ISD are asking, “How does changing the content and context of collegial conversations create a space for collaboration and reflection? How is this shift illuminated in teacher practice and expressed in student learning?”

The essential question of the CART group from Houston ISD's Challenge Early College High School, led by Matthew Martinez, is “What instructional strategies can we identify and implement to benefit our students’ learning and self-efficacy, and what structures can we establish that will build capacity across the faculty to examine classroom practice and adopt effective strategies?”

Debra McIntyre and her team from the SLC and PACE Programs in Humble ISD are asking, “How does a highly personalized educational experience reconnect at-risk students to the academic process?”

Lauren Nguyen, a Reading Specialist in Houston ISD’s Curriculum Department, will lead a multi-school team of reading teachers in a study of these two questions: “What impact does the Master Reading Teacher (MRT )have on reading test scores and the self-efficacy of teacher mentees? and Which MRT schedule shows the most impact?”

Sonia Pacé and her team from Anderson Academy in Aldine ISD will focus their inquiry around these questions: “How can Anderson Academy’s teachers collaborate to improve their classroom practices and student’s learning through the infusion of the arts in core curriculum? What can we learn about arts integration in the early years from the literature, school visits, and conference attendance? What integration strategies/approaches/content seen most attractive to our particular student population and teaching faculty? and What reflective insights bubble to the surface through this individual and shared inquiry?”

Mandi Painter and her team from Stovall Academy in Aldine ISD are asking, “What is the impact of daily reading interactions using poetry on early fluency development?”

Dr. Angela López Pedrana, an assistant professor in the Department of Urban Education at the University of Houston-Downtown, will be facilitating a group of faculty members from several local universities. Their inquiry revolves around these questions: “How might teachers’ knowledge, the contexts of teaching, and the influences that teachers have on student growth and achievement be better understood through collaborative forms of research and scholarship? and How might we advance the scholarship of teaching and research through sharing our unfolding inquiries with our field-based partners and Faculty Academy colleagues and capturing it in chapters, books, and portfolios?”

Carolyn Thibeaux from Chavez High School in Houston ISD is facilitating a team of educators from Alief, Aldine, and Houston ISD’s. They will be inquiring, “How does change in administrative leadership affect the school culture, as interpreted by empowered school leaders?”

Nichole Thompson from Houston Academy in Aldine ISD will be leading a collaborative group that includes educators from Bethune and Drew Academies as well. Their research questions include: “How have the STARS units of study been adapted? for what purpose to what effect? How might student and teacher learning relating to the units of study be documented and shared with others? and What reflective insights do our individual and collective inquiries into teachers’ curriculum making in context make possible?”

Reflections on the CART Grant

Here are my personal reflections and reminders for the process of developing a grant and shepherding people through the application process.

What Worked
•I was really glad to see that the number of CART applicants was more than double the number of Teacher As Researcher grant applicants that we had three years ago. I hope that this is an indicator of strengthening interest in CFG work in Houston.
•There was also more of a range of CFG experience in the applicants. A couple of the applicants just completed their training in spring 2007. For the TAR grants, most of the applicants had been trained in 1998 and 1999.
•The support sessions helped me and Tim make connections with the CFG community and I think it probably strengthened several of the applications.
•The scoring went smoothly. This particular group of readers/scorers was very serious and committed to carefully evaluating each proposal. I think it helped that I created the “What is A+. . .” information sheet that explained the purpose and values of the Houston A+ Challenge, CFG’s, and action research.

What Needs Tweaking
Here are a few things to remember to tune up if I am ever involved in writing another Request for Proposals.
•Add a line on the cover sheet for applicants to tell when they were trained as CFG coaches and who trained them. This will help us check and confirm eligibility. We were able to dissuade several non-CFG trained folks from applying for the grant when they came to the support sessions, but one slipped by. That group cannot get funds from this particular grant, but I hope that this experience encourages that school to send some people to CFG training.
•Be more clear about the limits of what A+ will fund. They do not pay for big technological purchases.
•Solicit more detailed information on the budget summary form.
•Remember to take a calculator to the scoring event. Some readers made minor math errors as they were scoring the applications. I double and triple checked everything at home later that night, but it would have been better to do that immediately so that I could have been absolutely certain of the scorer’s intent.
•I also regret that we didn’t have time to get written reflections from the readers.

Other Thoughts
On future requests for proposals, I want to communicate to the applicants that communication skills really do matter. Almost all the applications could have been improved by a careful editor. A razor-sharp focus with supporting details would be much easier for a reader to understand and score than the meandering prose this year’s readers sometimes had to deal with.
I have found that I have a really difficult time giving cool feedback about writing to adults. I know that this is ridiculous since I used to teach eighth grade English and had to prepare students for the Writing TAAS. Maybe it’s the fact that I think that feedback is most effective when it is asked for, and these colleagues haven’t asked for any specific feedback.
Finally, I want to note that the commitment letters really mattered to this set of scorers. They preferred individual letters to checklists, and lukewarm letters from supervisors were definitely remarked on on the scoring sheets.

May 31, 2007

May 2 Facilitator CFG

Reflections are in the extended entry. I will post a summary soon.

Continue reading "May 2 Facilitator CFG" »

About May 2007

This page contains all entries posted to Donna's Reflections in May 2007. They are listed from oldest to newest.

March 2007 is the previous archive.

June 2007 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.33