The K-16 CFG met this evening at The Rice School/La Escuela Rice. Present were Mary, Marilyn, Marcela, and Donna. We skipped over the opening team builder and started by going over a few announcements and talking about having a social event like a pot luck dinner sometime in March since the varied district spring break schedules are preventing us from having a regular meeting that month. This discussion morphed into an exploration of why there has been such light attendance the last few months. I have been disappointed and Mary even used the word "disheartened."
I wasn't planning on having this conversation, so I was not prepared with focusing questions or a protocol to guide the discussion. Still, I was impressed with how the group non-judgmentally teased out the major issues and proposed possible solutions to help get our critical friends back to the meetings. Here is a summary.
Barriers to meeting:
Scheduling around multiple after school commitments: This seems to be a challenge for many CFGs and our K-16 CFG is no exception. Our members are involved with graduate school classes, evening work obligations such as leading professional development classes, meetings for other school reform groups, school committees, etc., etc., etc. I don't know what to do about this except trust that each member will make a commitment to scheduling around CFG whenever possible.
Life happens: Sometimes things just happen. Members get sick, children get sick, parents get sick, administrators call emergency meetings. No amount of creative scheduling can prevent us from occasionally having to miss a meeting.
Sense of ownership is lacking: This is something that I've struggled with as a facilitator--How do we best balance the needs of the group with the needs of individuals? This year, we have really focused on developing a group goal and an action plan to study how we can best build capacity for professional learning communities in Houston. In the meantime, we have slacked off on putting our own work on the table and opening ourselves up to feedback.
Solution: Both Mary and Marilyn will bring "juicy dilemmas" to the April meeting. They need a crowd of critical friends to help them. They need you.
Irrelevance: Perhaps the K-16 CFG just no longer meets the needs of many group members. When this group started two years ago, many members were "CFG orphans" because their school-based groups had dwindled away. With job changes and the jumpstart of the Teacher As Researcher Grants, many K-16 group members have new CFGs or other outlets for professional conversations. The four of us that were at this meeting come because "I learn something when I come", "I need interaction", "It's an avenue to help me to help other groups", and "[It helps me be] true to what I'm doing."
Solution: Solicit more input about agendas.
Inertia: When somebody misses one meeting, then it gets easier to miss that second or third meeting. Without regular "face-time" we become disconnected from each other. We are tired and forget how uplifting and energizing the meetings can be.
Solution: Have a fabulous social event to reconnect with everybody and just have fun.
So the simple question "Do you think it would be a good idea to have a potluck" turned into a deep discussion about the state of our CFG--and then actually planning a potluck dinner became part of the solution to our current dilemma of missing so many of our dear critical friends!
After we closed the discussion, we went back and did a team builder called "Team Discovery" from The Big Book of Team Building Games by John Newstrom and Edward Scannell. The purpose of this activity is to create team identity by helping members to discover more about each other and to establish asking for information and self-disclosure as team norms. Together, we brainstormed a list of seven provocative questions that we wanted each other to answer. We then narrowed the list down to three questions that we were all comfortable with and took the time to go around and share the stories and opinions that addressed those questions. I loved hearing the laughter and passion that emerged from sharing a more personal side of ourselves. Are you wondering what we talked about? Sorry! Reading the weblog is no substitute for actually being there.
Reflections:
This CFG meeting was interesting and different. When I came I was disheartened about the members not showing up the way they should. We were able to talk through our feelings concerning this matter. And from this, I feel more confident that our potluck may bring around a change in the group. I enjoyed the team builder and I plan on using it!
Even though our group was small and intimate, it was good for me to interact verbally with these women. The team builder allowed us the chance to engage in intimate conversation. I don't think we would have talked about some of the things we did in a larger group. Hopefully, we can get the other members interested in coming out for the potluck in April.
I really enjoyed the small group conversations because it was small albeit the fact that we brainstormed ideas on how to get our members back! We do miss them, and I feel we lose so many opportunities to know each other in a more significant way. "We all count and bring something of ourselves to what we do!" The Team Discovery was an intimate affair which opened insight and connected me further to the group.
I really appreciated the deep discussion addressing our disappointment in attendance. It seems as if the sense of ownership is lacking. Somehow we need to reach out and let people know that they are needed and sorely missed.
Comments (6)
As I read the reflections, I'm struck with how there is such a tension between small and big, depth and breadth. Some reflections indicated that we enjoyed having a very small group for building intimacy on the team, yet we need a larger group to successfully do the important inquiry work that we've made a commitment to. How small is too small? How large is too large?
Posted by Donna | February 16, 2005 12:04 AM
Posted on February 16, 2005 00:04
It sounds like this was a really good meeting with meaningful conversation.
I have found in my work with CFG and other groups - that even though we want to share the vision and share the decision making that many people still look to a leader. We have a Presient of US, we have principals, we have department chairs, we have priests or ministers, we have parents and we have many leaders in our lives. I think we need explore the difference between leaders and bosses (or bossy people).
Are we leaders of the work?
Posted by Michaelann | February 16, 2005 7:26 AM
Posted on February 16, 2005 07:26
The Discovery activity was so so revealing. Intimate conversations allow people to almost melt into the skin of another. Donna's story about her twins was hilarious. It showed me a side of Donna that I had not seen before. Mary's let-it-all-hang-out conversation with her "introverted" daughter was very telling. Even though we pined for the other members, I know that we would not have ventured to engage in the type of conversation that we had last night in a large group setting.
Michaelann, I did not fully understand the "boss" comment. Will you expand further? Do you think that someone has been hired to be the "boss" of the K-16 group? I think the April meeting, not the Pot Luck, would be a good chance to share certain perceptions or even dissatifaction.
I hope that every one will set April 1 aside to come and fellowship.
Posted by Marilyn Cameron | February 16, 2005 11:36 AM
Posted on February 16, 2005 11:36
Dear Group Members,
I truly wish to apologize for not being able to attend the meeting on yesterday as I thought I would. I am truly having an issue with planning as an administrator. One of the biggest challenges for me is knowing my duty roster (that I get at the beginning of each month) and planning activities around it. I credit myself on being organized but my duties as an AP always seem to throw a wrench in my plans. It is frustrating but I have to do what I have to do. The real frustration comes when I am unable to do the many other things I enjoy like going to my CFG which keeps me grounded in the curriculum. Dealing with disciplinary issues all day is so mundane. I miss the collaboration with colleagues and students. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy what I do and I am really good at it but I am torn between being an instructional leader and an administrator. They are not the same thing.
Posted by Sharon | February 16, 2005 4:27 PM
Posted on February 16, 2005 16:27
Marilyn - The comment was not directed at anyone.
I was reflecting on groups that I know that are still working and learning. These groups even though they are democratic in nature still have a leader or guide.
Maybe I am in the wrong direction completely.
Posted by Michaelann | February 21, 2005 8:28 AM
Posted on February 21, 2005 08:28
I am with you. Even in a group of very capable people, there is still a need for some one(s) to keep things moving ahead.
I hope that everyone will be able to attend the Potluck. I need to call my three.
Posted by Marilyn | February 21, 2005 7:27 PM
Posted on February 21, 2005 19:27