Carl Glickman will present his lecture and has requested a panel of professors to do a tuning protocol on it. The lecture and tuning will take place at the AATC conference. The following is the proposed protocol that will be used.
Critical Colleague session with moderator and panel
After the Glickman AATC talk
(Suggested guidelines)
Moderator introduces the format (focus on content of presentation)
Section one (15 minutes)
Glickman answers questions to gather further background information only, he then removes himself from the group to listen and take notes.
Section Two (30 to 45 minutes): Moderator asks each panelist to respond to each question and holding each person to 2 to 3 minutes per response
As you followed the presentation, what were the central ideas found in the presentation by Glickman?
What would improve this presentation; additions, revisions, deletions, transitions?
What further application of the ideas, could have been made to your own professional and personal work?
Last 10 to 15 minutes of this section, comments from the floor
Section three (15 to 20 minutes): Moderator has panel synthesize and make three to five recommendations as to how to improve the presentation in the future.
In addition, each person in attendance is asked to write at least one statement as to how Glickman could improve the presentation
Section 4 (10 minutes) Moderator asks for any lingering thoughts about the process itself and what was learned and ensures that all written comments are collected.
Section 5 if time allows, Glickman concludes
This is very interesting in that it does not use specific CFG lingo, but the essence is there.
Comments (1)
I haven't had a chance to speak with everyone: I am one of the people that Carl Glickman invited to respond to his lecture. Unfortunately, my cough has persisted and I will not be able to attend the conference so someone else will have to take my place. Several of my doctoral students will hear the lecture. Perhaps I can ask one of them to record the lecture and the responses. Also, this is the same conference where Mark Seaman, one of my former doctoral students, will be receiving the award for outstanding dissertation in the teaching area. Shi Jing Xui of the University of Toronto, one of Michael Connelly's students, will receive the outstanding dissertation in the curriculum area. Lots of interesting things going on... I am very sad that I am not well enough to attend...
Posted by Cheryl Craig | September 30, 2007 6:18 PM
Posted on September 30, 2007 18:18